Serving users in mainland China without an ICP filing: Hong Kong and Japan VPS on China-optimised routes, ranked by measured latency (2026-10)

简体中文 Last price check: 2026-10-15

The fastest way to serve a website, API or app to users in mainland China is a server inside the mainland, but that needs an ICP filing first, and a filing needs a company registered in the mainland. For individuals and overseas companies without one, the realistic choice is Hong Kong or Japan, the closest places that need no filing, on a machine with a China-optimised route. Every table below is ranked by the slowest of the three carriers, China Telecom, China Unicom and China Mobile, as measured: when your users are spread across the country, the worst carrier is the one that counts.

Why Hong Kong and Japan

A domain pointing at a server in the mainland must have an ICP filing; without one, the cloud provider blocks ports 80 and 443. A filing needs a business registered in the mainland, so a foreign company without a mainland branch cannot get one, and a foreign individual can file a personal site only with a fixed residence in China. Alibaba Cloud’s own advice to foreign customers who do not qualify is to host the site in Hong Kong.

Hong Kong needs no filing and is the closest option: a little over 10 ms to Guangdong and 30 to 40 ms to northern China. Japan is further, 50 to 80 ms to the mainland on a good route, but it is in a region Anthropic supports, so the same machine can serve mainland users and run Claude Code or other AI agents, which a Hong Kong machine cannot. Singapore and the US are further still and less stable at the evening peak.

The route matters more than the city

Within Hong Kong alone, the best machines on optimised routes measure 30 to 40 ms on all three carriers, while machines on standard international routes measure over 160 ms with more than half the packets lost; a machine sold as optimised can still detour on one carrier, for example when only China Telecom is optimised. A 2020 academic measurement found the bottleneck inside mainland China on seven in ten cross-border paths, so what decides the experience is which carrier network the machine uses: CN2 GIA for China Telecom, 9929 and CU2 for China Unicom, CMIN2 and CMI for China Mobile, and “All 3 carriers optimised” where the vendor optimises all three. Machines sold on a standard route that measure within 80 ms on all three carriers are included too: the measurement decides.

Hong Kong: in-stock plans with the fastest measured times on all three carriers

Hong Kong plans in stock, on an optimised route or measuring within 80 ms on all three carriers, ranked by their slowest carrier, then by monthly price; the best one’s slowest carrier is at 32 ms right now. Click a column header to sort.

VendorPlanRoute SpecsBandwidth and trafficMonthly priceList price and billingTest IP
JttiHK CLOUD 1C1G yearly dealCN2 GIA (all 3 carriers optimised)1 vCPU / 1G / 50GB2Mbps, unlimited traffic$4.16$49.86/yr (list price $166.20, renewal price unconfirmed)177.4.8.254 Telecom 32 · Unicom 32 · Mobile 31 ms
LcayunHong Kong BGP Elastic 1 vCPU 8GStandard route1 vCPU / 8G / 30GB3Mbps, not stated$13.85¥1115/yr, monthly ¥95103.116.247.171 Telecom 32 · Unicom 35 · Mobile 41 ms
DMITHKG.AS3.Pro.TINY (Premium)CN2 GIA1 vCPU / 1G / 20GB SSD1Gbps, 500GB$39.90$39.90/mo103.117.100.20 Telecom 35 · Unicom 38 · Mobile 42 ms
DMITHKG.AS3.Pro.MEDIUM (Premium)CN2 GIA4 vCPU / 8G / 160GB SSD1Gbps, 2500GB$239.90$239.90/mo103.117.100.20 Telecom 35 · Unicom 38 · Mobile 42 ms
TmhHostYearly deal HK S1CN2 (all 3 carriers optimised)2 vCPU / 4G / 40GB SSD10Mbps, 2000GB$4.82From ¥388/yr154.64.248.192 Telecom 39 · Unicom 34 · Mobile 43 ms
DMITHKG.AS3.EB.WEE (Eyeball, best-effort China route optimisation)Standard route1 vCPU / 1G / 20GB SSD500Mbps, 500GB$24.90$24.90/mo103.135.248.201 Telecom 34 · Unicom 33 · Mobile 43 ms
LcayunHong Kong CN2 GIA Elastic, smallest planCN2 GIA1 vCPU / 1G / 30GB3Mbps, not stated$4.35From ¥350/yr, monthly from ¥351.32.228.113 Telecom 30 · Unicom 66 · Mobile 39 ms
LcayunHong Kong CN2 GIA Elastic 1 vCPU 8GCN2 GIA1 vCPU / 8G / 30GB3Mbps, not stated$14.78¥1190/yr, monthly ¥1051.32.228.113 Telecom 30 · Unicom 66 · Mobile 39 ms
LisaHostHong Kong direct to all 3 carriers CMI/CU2/CN2 yearly dealCMI (all 3 carriers optimised)1 vCPU / 1G / 10GB NVMe50Mbps, 600GB$7.03¥566/yr154.44.27.223 Telecom 40 · Unicom 29 · Mobile 189 ms

Japan: in-stock plans with the fastest measured times on all three carriers

Same rules and ranking; the best one’s slowest carrier is at 76 ms right now. Japanese machines on optimised routes cost more than Hong Kong ones, and Japanese machines on standard routes mostly measure over 100 ms to the mainland, slower still at the evening peak.

VendorPlanRoute SpecsBandwidth and trafficMonthly priceList price and billingTest IP
V.PSNRT EPYC Flash Gen 2 (Performance, CTGNet)CN2 GIA, CMIN2 (all 3 carriers optimised)2 vCPU / 4G / 30GB NVMe1Gbps, 1TB$55.97€49.95/mo
Same price on renewal
45.94.40.13 Telecom 54 · Unicom 49 · Mobile 76 ms
V.PSNRT EPYC Flow Gen 2 (Performance, CTGNet)CN2 GIA, CMIN2 (all 3 carriers optimised)2 vCPU / 8G / 60GB NVMe1.25Gbps, 2TB$107.51€95.95/mo
Same price on renewal
45.94.40.13 Telecom 54 · Unicom 49 · Mobile 76 ms
LcayunJapan BGP Elastic, smallest planStandard route1 vCPU / 1G / 30GB100Mbps, not stated$4.35From ¥350/yr, monthly from ¥3564.83.35.136 Telecom 60 · Unicom 67 · Mobile 80 ms
LcayunJapan BGP Elastic 1 vCPU 8GStandard route1 vCPU / 8G / 30GB100Mbps, 500GB$14.78¥1190/yr, monthly ¥10564.83.35.136 Telecom 60 · Unicom 67 · Mobile 80 ms
BandwagonHostOsaka CN2 GIA 40GCN2 GIA (all 3 carriers optimised)2 vCPU / 2G / 40GB SSD1.5Gbps, 500GB$41.67$499.99/yr, monthly $49.99212.50.253.232 Telecom 91 · Unicom 111 · Mobile 107 ms
BandwagonHostOsaka CN2 GIA 160GCN2 GIA (all 3 carriers optimised)6 vCPU / 8G / 160GB SSD1.5Gbps, 2TB$138.83$1665.99/yr, monthly $165.99212.50.253.232 Telecom 91 · Unicom 111 · Mobile 107 ms
BandwagonHostTokyo CN2 GIA 40GCN2 GIA (all 3 carriers optimised)2 vCPU / 2G / 40GB SSD1.2Gbps, 500GB$75.00$899.99/yr, monthly $89.99—

Hong Kong or Japan

If your users are mostly in southern China and all you need is the lowest latency, choose Hong Kong: an optimised route costs a few dollars a month, though bandwidth is usually only a few to a few dozen Mbps. If the same machine must also run Claude Code or an AI agent, or your users are in Japan or Korea as well, choose Japan: it is in a region Anthropic supports, and a good route costs more. If you need both, put the user-facing entry point in Hong Kong and the back end and agents in Japan.

What these servers cannot do

Machines in Hong Kong and Japan have no mainland IP address and their sites cannot be ICP-filed, so they cannot use a mainland CDN or the filed domains WeChat mini programs require. For those you need a mainland company, a filing and a mainland data centre. The latencies in the tables come from public probes in data centres, not home broadband; pinging a test IP yourself at 9 to 10 pm China time is the most accurate check.

Where the test IPs and latency figures come from

A test IP is a machine the vendor publishes for this data centre and this route. Before buying you can ping it to see how fast your own network reaches it. Clicking an IP opens a multi-node ping across China on itdog, which you can break down by province and carrier.

Where the IPs come from
The vendor's website or Looking Glass page, or the vendor's reply to a support ticket; a few come from third-party reviews. When an IP published by the vendor no longer answers, we replace it with the reachable address with the lowest latency in the same subnet.
Who measures the latency
Probes in mainland China from two public measurement networks. Each hour one vendor takes its turn, so each vendor is measured in two or three time slots a day, by day and at night, and the day's runs are averaged. Each run uses up to 12 probes on each of Telecom, Unicom and Mobile (6 per network; when a network has fewer that day, we use what it has), and each probe pings 4 times.
How to read it
“Telecom 18 · Unicom 22 · Mobile 37 ms” is the latency on each of the three carriers; hover to see the probe cities and loss rate. When a carrier shows 20% loss or more, it is spelt out, e.g. “Telecom 99 (loss 55%)”. That latency figure is only the average of the packets that came back, and in real use the connection will lag; the “My network” filter and sorting do not count it as reachable. We have cross-checked such loss over TCP ports: the handshake time grows several-fold, so it is the path from that carrier to the data centre that drops packets, not the server rate-limiting ping. Sorting by the column uses the fastest of the three carriers.
No reply and unreachable
“no reply” on one carrier means that probe could not reach the IP. “Test IP unreachable” means probes both inside and outside China could not reach it, usually because the IP has been retired; it does not mean the route or the server is unavailable. IPs that block ping are tested on TCP port 80/443 instead.
How accurate is it
For reference only. Each run uses at most 12 probes per carrier, pinging 4 times each; the probes change every run, most sit in data centres rather than on home broadband, and bandwidth and the evening peak are not measured.

What the route names mean

The route is which carrier's network, and which of its networks, carries traffic between mainland China and the data centre. The closer to China and the better the route, the smoother SSH and web pages feel, and the steadier things are at the evening peak.

CN2 GIA
China Telecom's premium network (AS4809), with CN2 both ways. Low latency, stable at the evening peak, the most expensive. The first choice for Telecom users.
CN2 GT
The standard version of Telecom CN2: the international leg uses CN2, the domestic leg uses the ordinary 163 backbone. Cheaper than GIA, a little less stable at the evening peak.
CN2
The vendor only says CN2, without stating GIA or GT; it is safer to expect GT-level performance.
9929
China Unicom's premium network (AS9929, also called Unicom A network or CUII). Works best for Unicom users.
4837
China Unicom's standard backbone (AS4837). Cheap, plentiful bandwidth; may be congested at the evening peak.
CMIN2
China Mobile's premium network (AS58807). Works best for Mobile users.
CMI
China Mobile International's standard outbound route (AS58453): better than a standard route for Mobile users, worse than CMIN2.
All 3 carriers optimised
The vendor states that return traffic for all of Telecom, Unicom and Mobile goes over optimised routes, so it will not be too bad whichever broadband you use.
Standard route
A standard international route, not optimised for mainland China; may slow down noticeably at the evening peak. Suitable as a Main server, reached through a Relay.

This site labels routes as each vendor states them and does not run route tests. Real-world results depend on your broadband carrier; test with the test IP before buying.